Last Updated: December 2025
If Bitcoin Dev Kit (BDK) is your wallet's foundation, Lightning Dev Kit (LDK) is how you add superpowers to it. We're talking instant payments, global reach, and fees measured in satoshis instead of dollars.
While BDK handles on-chain Bitcoin beautifully, the reality is that for micropayments, instant settlements, and everyday transactions, you need Lightning. And if you're building anything serious on Lightning in 2025, LDK should be on your radar.
What is Lightning Dev Kit?
Lightning Dev Kit (LDK) is a flexible, modular Lightning Network implementation written in Rust. But here's what makes it different from other Lightning nodes: it's not actually a node. It's a toolkit that lets you build your own Lightning node exactly the way you need it.
Think of it like LEGO blocks for Lightning. Instead of getting a pre-built house (like LND or Core Lightning), you get the pieces to build whatever structure you want. Need a mobile Lightning wallet? Build it. Want to run thousands of Lightning nodes in a single process? LDK can do that. Browser-based Lightning? Yep, that too.
Originally created by Matt Corallo (@TheBlueMatt) in 2018 as rust-lightning, LDK was later supported by Spiral (Jack Dorsey's Bitcoin development company) and has evolved into one of the most innovative Lightning implementations available.
The Core Philosophy
LDK follows a radically different approach than traditional Lightning implementations:
- Library, not a daemon - You integrate Lightning into your app, not the other way around
- Bring your own everything - Choose your blockchain source, database, key management, networking
- Mobile-first - Designed from day one to run on phones, not just servers
- Unopinionated - You make the decisions, LDK handles the protocol
Why LDK is Different (and Why That Matters)
Traditional Lightning Nodes vs LDK
Traditional Approach (LND, Core Lightning, Eclair):
- Run as standalone daemons
- Make decisions for you about storage, networking, etc.
- Great for running a node
- Hard to customize
- Resource-intensive for mobile
LDK Approach:
- Library you integrate into your app
- You control everything
- Perfect for custom applications
- Mobile-optimized
- Run multiple nodes in one process
This flexibility is why companies like Lightspark chose LDK to power their infrastructure serving enterprises like Coinbase.
Real-World Applications Using LDK
LDK isn't theoretical - it's powering some of the most innovative Lightning wallets and services:
Mutiny Wallet 🌐
The first self-custodial Lightning wallet that runs entirely in a web browser. No app store, no downloads, just visit the website and you have a Lightning node. Built using LDK compiled to WebAssembly.
What they said:
"It wouldn't have been possible to build a wallet like Mutiny in any other way. Since LDK is written in Rust, we were able to compile it into WebAssembly."
Lightspark ⚡
Enterprise Lightning infrastructure used by major companies including Coinbase. They chose LDK for its ability to run multiple Lightning nodes in a single process - something traditional implementations can't do efficiently.
Their achievement: Scaled to handle thousands of nodes by using LDK's flexibility to share resources (blockchain data, network graph updates) across all nodes instead of each node fetching independently.
Fedimint Lightning Gateway 🔐
LDK Node (the higher-level wrapper) powers Fedimint's Lightning gateways, enabling ecash-to-Lightning swaps. The integration was so smooth they only needed to implement a handful of functions.
Other Notable Projects:
- Blue Wallet - Mobile Lightning implementation using LDK
- Sensei - Multi-node Lightning solution
- LQWD - Just-in-time liquidity provider using LDK Node
- Various LSPs - Lightning Service Providers building on LDK
What Makes LDK Special?
1. True Multi-Platform Support
LDK runs everywhere:
- Mobile: iOS and Android (native performance)
- Web: Compiled to WebAssembly, runs in browsers
- Desktop: Linux, macOS, Windows
- Embedded: IoT devices, POS terminals
- Server: Cloud infrastructure, HSMs
2. Flexible Architecture
You have complete control over:
Blockchain Data Source:
- Bitcoin Core RPC
- Electrum servers
- Esplora
- Compact Block Filters (via Kyoto)
- Your own custom solution
Persistence:
- SQLite
- PostgreSQL
- File system
- Cloud storage
- Custom database
Key Management:
- Hardware wallets
- Remote signing
- Software keys
- Custom HSMs
Networking:
- Standard P2P
- Tor support
- Custom transport layers
3. Mobile-First Design
Before LDK, running Lightning on mobile was painful. You had to:
- Modify LND or Core Lightning
- Deal with background limitations
- Struggle with resource constraints
- Handle intermittent connectivity
LDK was built specifically for mobile:
- Lightweight footprint
- Handles intermittent connections gracefully
- Efficient battery usage
- No assumptions about "always online"
- SPV blockchain data sources
4. Multiple Nodes, Single Process
This is huge for scalability. Traditional Lightning implementations require one process per node. LDK lets you run thousands of nodes in a single process by sharing common resources.
Why this matters:
- Massive resource savings
- Better for cloud deployments
- Enables LSP-style services
- Lower operational costs
5. Language Bindings
While written in Rust, LDK provides native bindings for:
- Rust (obviously)
- Swift (iOS)
- Java/Kotlin (Android)
- JavaScript/TypeScript (via WASM)
- Python
LDK vs Other Lightning Implementations
LDK vs LND (Lightning Labs)
LND:
- ✅ Great for running a node out-of-the-box
- ✅ Extensive documentation and tooling
- ✅ Large ecosystem (Loop, Pool, Lightning Terminal)
- ⚠️ Standalone daemon (hard to customize)
- ⚠️ Challenging for mobile
- ⚠️ Makes decisions for you
LDK:
- ✅ Maximum flexibility and customization
- ✅ Perfect for mobile
- ✅ Can run multiple nodes efficiently
- ✅ Library approach (not a daemon)
- ⚠️ Requires more setup knowledge
- ⚠️ You make all the decisions
Best for:
- LND: Running your own node, server applications
- LDK: Building custom wallets, mobile apps, specialized services
LDK vs Core Lightning (Blockstream)
Core Lightning:
- ✅ Lightweight and modular (plugin architecture)
- ✅ Spec-focused and compliant
- ✅ Low resource usage
- ✅ Written in C (portable)
- ⚠️ Still a standalone node
- ⚠️ Harder for mobile than LDK
LDK:
- ✅ More flexible than even CLN
- ✅ Better mobile support
- ✅ Modern Rust codebase
- ✅ True library approach
- ⚠️ Newer and less battle-tested than CLN
Best for:
- Core Lightning: Self-hosted nodes, embedded devices, advanced users
- LDK: Application developers, wallet builders, mobile-first projects
LDK vs Eclair (ACINQ)
Eclair:
- ✅ Powers Phoenix Wallet (excellent UX)
- ✅ Scala/JVM-based
- ✅ Strong focus on mobile (via Phoenix)
- ⚠️ More opinionated than LDK
- ⚠️ Primarily ACINQ's stack
LDK:
- ✅ More customizable
- ✅ Broader language support
- ✅ Active open-source community
- ✅ Vendor-neutral
Best for:
- Eclair: If you like ACINQ's approach and JVM stack
- LDK: If you want maximum control and Rust
Getting Started with LDK
Two Paths: LDK or LDK Node?
LDK (rust-lightning):
- The core library
- Maximum flexibility
- You make every decision
- More complex to use
- Best for: Custom implementations, advanced use cases
LDK Node:
- Higher-level wrapper around LDK
- Pre-configured defaults
- Easier to get started
- Integrated BDK wallet
- Best for: Quick prototyping, mobile wallets, standard use cases
For most developers, start with LDK Node then drop down to core LDK if you need more control.
LDK Node Quick Start
Add to Cargo.toml:
[dependencies]
ldk-node = "0.3"
Basic Example:
use ldk_node::Builder;
use ldk_node::bitcoin::Network;
fn main() {
// Create node builder
let mut builder = Builder::new();
builder.set_network(Network::Testnet);
builder.set_esplora_server("https://blockstream.info/testnet/api".to_string());
builder.set_storage_dir_path("/tmp/ldk_node".to_string());
// Build and start the node
let node = builder.build().unwrap();
node.start().unwrap();
// Generate a new on-chain address
let address = node.new_onchain_address().unwrap();
println!("Fund this address: {}", address);
// Listen for events
node.next_event(); // Process events
// Open a channel (once funded)
let channel_id = node.connect_open_channel(
peer_pubkey,
peer_addr,
channel_amount_sats,
None, // push_msat
None, // channel_config
true, // announce_channel
).unwrap();
println!("Channel opened: {}", channel_id);
}
Receiving a Payment
use ldk_node::lightning_invoice::Bolt11Invoice;
// Create invoice
let invoice = node.receive_payment(
amount_msat,
"Description",
expiry_secs,
).unwrap();
println!("Pay this invoice: {}", invoice);
// Wait for payment
loop {
if let Some(event) = node.next_event() {
println!("Event: {:?}", event);
// Handle payment received event
break;
}
}
Sending a Payment
// Parse invoice
let invoice: Bolt11Invoice = "lnbc...".parse().unwrap();
// Send payment
let payment_hash = node.send_payment(&invoice).unwrap();
println!("Payment sent: {}", payment_hash);
That's it! You now have a working Lightning node.
Advanced Features
1. Rapid Gossip Sync (RGS)
Instead of syncing the entire Lightning network graph (which can take minutes), RGS lets you download a compressed snapshot in seconds.
builder.set_gossip_source_rgs("https://rgs.mutinynet.com/snapshot/".to_string());
Perfect for mobile apps where sync time matters.
2. Just-In-Time (JIT) Channels
Using the Lightning Liquidity crate with LDK Node, you can provision channels on-demand when receiving payments. This eliminates the "inbound liquidity" problem that plagues Lightning UX.
How it works:
- User wants to receive payment
- They request liquidity from an LSP
- LSP provides SCID and routing hints
- Payment arrives, channel is created JIT
- Funds land in new channel
3. Offline Receive
One of Lightning's biggest UX challenges: mobile wallets can't receive payments when the app is closed. LDK is working on solutions:
- Async Payments Protocol - Being developed by Matt Corallo
- LSP Forwarding - Let an LSP hold funds temporarily
- Triggered Notifications - Wake the app when payment arrives
4. BOLT 12 Offers
LDK supports BOLT 12, the next evolution of Lightning payments:
- Reusable payment codes (no more invoices for every payment)
- Better privacy via blinded paths
- Recurring payments support
- Onion message routing
5. Custom Signing
LDK's signing interface allows:
- Hardware wallet integration
- Remote signing (keys never leave your server)
- Multi-sig setups
- Custom key derivation
// Example: Custom signer implementation
impl SignerProvider for MyCustomSigner {
fn derive_channel_signer(
&self,
channel_value_satoshis: u64,
channel_keys_id: [u8; 32]
) -> Self::Signer {
// Your custom key derivation logic
}
}
Building a Web Lightning Wallet (Like Mutiny)
Here's how LDK enables browser-based Lightning:
- Compile to WASM:
[dependencies]
ldk-node = { version = "0.3", default-features = false, features = ["std"] }
wasm-bindgen = "0.2"
- Create bindings:
use wasm_bindgen::prelude::*;
#[wasm_bindgen]
pub struct WebLightningNode {
node: Arc<Node>,
}
#[wasm_bindgen]
impl WebLightningNode {
pub fn new() -> Self {
// Initialize node
}
pub fn create_invoice(&self, amount: u64) -> String {
// Generate invoice
}
}
- Use in JavaScript:
import init, { WebLightningNode } from './pkg/my_wallet.js';
await init();
const node = WebLightningNode.new();
const invoice = node.create_invoice(1000);
- Handle Storage: Since browsers don't have reliable local storage, use:
- IndexedDB for local persistence
- VSS (Versioned Storage Service) for encrypted cloud backups
LDK Node vs Core LDK: When to Use Each
Use LDK Node When:
- Building a mobile wallet
- You want sensible defaults
- Quick time-to-market
- Standard Lightning functionality is enough
- You're okay with BDK for on-chain
Use Core LDK When:
- Running an LSP
- Need custom blockchain sources
- Want complete control over everything
- Building something novel
- Integrating into existing infrastructure
Real Example: Lightspark
Lightspark uses core LDK to:
- Run multiple nodes per process
- Share blockchain data across nodes
- Implement custom remote signing
- Optimize for enterprise scale
They couldn't have done this with LDK Node - they needed the low-level control.
Common Challenges and Solutions
Challenge 1: Liquidity Management
Problem: Users can't receive until they have inbound liquidity
Solutions:
- Integrate an LSP (Lightning Service Provider)
- Use JIT channels (LSPS2 protocol)
- Pre-open channels with dual-funding
- Use services like Blocktank, Voltage Flow, or LQWD
Challenge 2: Routing Reliability
Problem: Payments sometimes fail
Solutions:
- Implement LDK's ProbabilisticScorer
- Use multi-path payments (MPP)
- Regular channel rebalancing
- Monitor success rates and adjust
// Configure pathfinding
let mut scorer_params = ProbabilisticScoringDecayParameters::default();
scorer_params.base_penalty_msat = 1000;
scorer_params.historical_liquidity_penalty_multiplier_msat = 10_000;
Challenge 3: Mobile Background Restrictions
Problem: OS kills the app, node goes offline
Solutions:
- Use Rapid Gossip Sync for fast restarts
- Implement proper state persistence
- Use LSPs for offline receive
- Consider push notifications for incoming HTLCs
Challenge 4: First-Time User Experience
Problem: Users need inbound liquidity before first receive
Solutions:
- Partner with an LSP
- Zero-conf channels
- JIT channel opening
- Pre-funded channels from a faucet (testnet)
Performance Benchmarks
Based on real-world deployments:
Mutiny Wallet (Web):
- Initial sync: ~2-5 seconds (with RGS)
- Payment send time: 1-3 seconds
- Browser memory usage: ~50-100MB
- Works on low-end phones
Lightspark (Enterprise):
- Nodes per process: 1000+
- Shared resource savings: 70%+
- Payment success rate: 95%+
- Handles high-frequency payments
LDK Node (Mobile):
- App size increase: ~3-5MB
- Memory usage: ~20-50MB
- Cold start time: <5 seconds
- Battery impact: Minimal
The LDK Ecosystem
Core Components
rust-lightning - The core Lightning protocol implementation
ldk-node - Higher-level node implementation with batteries included
ldk-sample - Reference implementation showing all the pieces
ldk-c-bindings - C bindings for other language FFI
ldk-garbagecollected - Bindings for Java, Python, etc.
Supporting Crates
lightning-liquidity - JIT channel liquidity management
lightning-invoice - BOLT 11 invoice handling
lightning-rapid-gossip-sync - Fast network graph syncing
lightning-transaction-sync - Blockchain data synchronization
Tools and Services
Polar - Visual Lightning Network simulator (supports LDK)
Voltage - Cloud Lightning infrastructure (LDK-powered)
Blocktank - LSP providing liquidity services
LQWD - Just-in-time liquidity provider
The Road Ahead: What's Coming
Dual-Funded Channels
Complete support for BOLT 2's interactive transaction construction, enabling:
- Both parties contribute to channel funding
- Better capital efficiency
- Instant inbound liquidity
Splicing
Resize channels without closing:
- Add funds to existing channels
- Remove funds while keeping channel open
- Better UX for liquidity management
Async Payments
Receive payments while offline:
- LSP holds payment temporarily
- Device wakes up and claims funds
- Trustless (uses HTLCs)
BOLT 12 Adoption
Full reusable payment codes:
- QR codes that work multiple times
- Better privacy
- Recurring payment support
Taproot Channels
Privacy and efficiency improvements:
- Indistinguishable from normal transactions
- Lower fees
- Better multi-sig
Community and Resources
The LDK community is super active and welcoming:
Discord - Main hub for real-time help (very responsive)
GitHub Discussions - For longer-form technical discussions
Documentation - https://lightningdevkit.org/
Sample Implementations:
- ldk-sample (Rust reference)
- ldk-node-sample (higher-level reference)
- mutiny-node (Web example)
Who Should Use LDK?
Perfect For:
- Mobile wallet developers
- Web app developers wanting Lightning
- Companies building Lightning infrastructure
- Projects needing custom Lightning behavior
- Developers who want to learn Lightning internals
- Anyone building something novel
Maybe Not Ideal For:
- Just running a personal Lightning node (use LND or CLN)
- Quick prototypes where custodial is okay
- Projects with zero Rust experience and no time to learn
- Simple payment processors (custodial APIs might be easier)
Final Verdict
LDK represents the future of how developers will integrate Lightning. Instead of running a separate node and talking to it via RPC, you integrate Lightning directly into your application with complete control.
Is it more complex than using a hosted Lightning API? Yes. But you get true self-custody, maximum flexibility, and the ability to build things that simply aren't possible with other approaches (like browser-based Lightning or multi-tenant LSPs).
In 2025, if you're building anything serious on Lightning that requires customization, mobile support, or scale, LDK should be your first choice.
Resources
- Official Website: https://lightningdevkit.org/
- GitHub: https://github.com/lightningdevkit
- Documentation: https://docs.rs/lightning
- Discord: https://discord.gg/xaYE3pDQpm
- LDK Node: https://github.com/lightningdevkit/ldk-node
- Sample Implementations: https://github.com/lightningdevkit/ldk-sample
Building with LDK? We'd love to hear what you're working on! Drop a comment or share your project.
Pro Tip: If you built a Bitcoin wallet with BDK (from our previous article), adding Lightning via LDK is the natural next step. They're designed to work together beautifully.
Note: This review is based on LDK as of December 2025. The Lightning Network moves fast - always check the latest docs for new features and updates.